RedState91%

House Votes to Lock the Clock - for Good 51%

By Jennifer Oliver O'Connell56%

7/14/2026, 8:30:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 885 faulty-reasoning hits from 486 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,867 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the article peer group.

As my colleague Ward Clark reported on Friday, the U.S. 
House of Representatives moved the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make Daylight Saving Time permanent throughout the United States, from committee to the House floor for a vote. 
On Tuesday, the full House voted and passed the Act, 308-117. 
The House on Tuesday voted to make daylight saving time permanent nationwide, amid a yearslong push to end the twice-annual clock changes. 
The bill, titled the Sunshine Protection Act, passed in a 308 to 117 vote. 
In addition to keeping clocks shifted one hour ahead, which happens in the spring, the measure would allow states to use standard time if an exemption is in effect before the federal law is enacted. 
Hawaii and most of Arizona currently use standard time year-round. 
"I don't really know anybody who wants to change the clock anymore," said Democratic Rep. 
Frank Pallone of New Jersey on Monday as the House Rules Committee considered the measure. 
GOP Rep. 
Vern Buchanan of Florida, who introduced the bill, said Tuesday the clock changes disrupt schedules "for no good reason." 
This is performative theater and nothing more. 
There are more pressing issues for our country and on the House docket, like national security appropriations, bills to combat fraud, and government controls over AI and data centers. 
But fresh off the House's July 4th recess, this was first up for consideration. 
According to Independent Rep. 
Kevin Kiley (CA-03), the decision to suspend the production of pennies is next in line. 
Since the Sunshine Protection Act is a Trump-endorsed bill, the slightly bipartisan margin of YES votes probably gives Democrats bragging rights that they are getting along and reaching across the aisle. 
Whatever. 
Proponents of the bill argue the change would have positive impacts on sleep schedules, people's health and the economy, and would allow Americans to have more daylight hours in the evening throughout the year. 
Its critics say extended darkness in the morning hours of winter would have negative effects on health and safety. 
As the bill heads to the Senate, at least one Democrat is on board. 
Sen. 
Patty Murray (D-WA) sponsored a 2022 bill in the Senate to do the same thing, and excitedly posted on X to her constituents claiming that she urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to bring it to the Senate floor. 
WATCH: 
These people can do nothing without a sprinkling of TDS. 
We will see how many of her colleagues sign on with her, or how many of the rogue Republican Senators vote NO or abstain just to stick it to Trump. 
Queue the R.E.M. 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy RedState's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.6%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 5.0%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias12.6%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.3%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 3.4%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic6.2%This article: 2.9%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.9%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.7%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.7%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 4.8%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 6.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.3%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion6.0%This article: 4.5%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.3%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 5.4%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias7.0%This article: 1.4%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.5%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.4%This article: 11.3%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 5.6%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias11.3%This article: 6.4%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 2.7%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 1.6%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 3.0%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 1.8%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 6.4%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.1%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.3%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.8%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias10.3%This article: 2.9%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.3%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.2%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.2%This article: 8.2%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 3.2%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem8.2%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.8%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.6%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 2.8%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority5.6%This article: 7.6%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 1.3%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma7.6%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.7%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 6.2%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization6.0%This article: 6.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.4%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring6.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.7%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.3%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 6.6%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 1.4%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 1.3%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 2.7%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.2%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.0%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.2%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.2%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.1%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.2%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division2.1%This article: 3.1%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 3.7%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal3.1%This article: 2.1%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.2%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman2.1%This article: 3.9%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.9%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.1%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.6%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.1%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.8%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 11.9%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 13.6%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice11.9%This article: 2.9%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 2.3%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 8.0%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 0.5%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias8.0%This article: 18.5%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 7.9%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias18.5%This article: 9.1%Jennifer Oliver O'Connell: 3.5%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.1%

486 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers21%attributed speech383writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageFrank Pallone of New Jersey • 15 words • 100.0% coverageFrank Pallone of New Jersey • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageVern Buchanan of Florida • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Kiley (CA-03) • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coveragePatty Murray (D-WA) • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Patty Murray (D-WA)

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words38% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Patty Murray (D-WA): 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -23.5 ptsWriter: 23.5%Patty Murray (D-WA): 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.1 ptsWriter: 15.1%Patty Murray (D-WA): 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.5 ptsWriter: 11.5%Patty Murray (D-WA): 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Patty Murray (D-WA): 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.