Speaker summary
81% 11 analyzed articles/videos 337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vance results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 222.548 hits . Analysis detected 1,707.548 faulty-reasoning hits from 337 analyzed words across 11 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,467 of 27,710 speakers). This Vance is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Vance
Speaker details
Total words: 337
Content count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 8.4% BS Score11 analyzed videos337 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 66.0% 66.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Optimism Bias: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 6/20/2026, 11:21:11 PM