Speaker summary
83% 6 analyzed articles/videos 919.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Usamah Andrabi results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 4,531.33 faulty-reasoning hits from 919.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,033 of 28,364 speakers). This Usamah Andrabi is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Usamah Andrabi
Speaker details
Total words: 919.667
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.8% percentile 13.4% BS Score6 analyzed videos919.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 62.1% 62.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 39.1% 39.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 41.5% 41.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 30.0% 30.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 30.8% 30.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 15.4% 15.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 62.1%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst