Speaker summary
41%8 analyzed articles/videos194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Red Herring, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 82.895 hits. Analysis detected 376.068 faulty-reasoning hits from 194 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,172 of 28,364 speakers). This U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
13.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos194 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 12.3%12.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.3%10.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.9%Red Herring: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate