Speaker summary
55% 21 analyzed articles/videos 1,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Troy Jackson results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Self-Serving Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 341.463 hits . Analysis detected 2,573.283 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,496 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,899 of 28,364 speakers). This Troy Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Troy Jackson
Speaker details
Total words: 1,496
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.6% percentile 4.2% BS Score21 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 22.8% 22.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst