Speaker summary
66% 5 analyzed articles/videos 714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trita Parsi results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Self-Serving Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 177.651 hits . Analysis detected 1,184.07 faulty-reasoning hits from 714 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,713 of 28,364 speakers). This Trita Parsi is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Trita Parsi
Speaker details
Total words: 714
Content count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 7.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos714 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 26.4% 26.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.7% 17.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst