Trump: U.S.-Iran Cease-Fire Is 'Over' After Strikes Resume in Strait of Hormuz ⁠15%

By Alexandra Sharp⁠21%

7/8/2026, 8:59:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 2,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,139 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (17,534 of 20,517 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the article peer group.

FP’s flagship daily newsletter, catching you up on 24 hours of news in five minutes. 
Delivered weekdays. 
Is the U.S.-Iran Cease-Fire Over? 
Trump calls continued peace talks a “waste of time” as strikes resume. 
An illustration of Alexandra Sharp, World Brief newsletter writer 
By Alexandra Sharp , the World Brief writer at Foreign Policy . 
U.S. 
President Donald Trump sits in a chair during a NATO meeting. 
A U.S. flag is seen behind him. 
U.S. 
President Donald Trump holds a meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (not pictured) at the Presidential Complex in Ankara, Turkey, on July 7. 
Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images 
July 8, 2026, 4:59 PM 
Welcome back to World Brief, where we’re looking at renewed strikes between U.S. and Iranian forces, the winners and losers of the NATO leaders’ summit, and the United States threatening to cut off trade with Spain . 
The U.S.-Iran cease-fire appears to be effectively dead. 
Just 21 days after U.S. and Iranian officials signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that halted active fighting, removed the U.S. naval blockade on Iran, and laid the groundwork for future nuclear talks, U.S. 
President Donald Trump told NATO leaders on Wednesday that the truce deal is done . 
“As far as I’m concerned, it’s over,” Trump said, calling the Iranian regime “cuckoo.” 
Although the U.S. president said that peace talks would continue, he remained skeptical about their probability of success. 
“They can talk, but I think they’re wasting their time,” Trump said. 
On Tuesday, Iranian forces damaged several oil and gas tankers traversing the Strait of Hormuz; these vessels appeared to be trying to use a route that avoided Iranian waters. 
Within hours, the U.S. military responded with more than 80 strikes on Iranian air defense systems, command and control centers, coastal radar sites, and anti-ship missile capabilities, among other targets. 
The United States hit Iran “very hard last night,” Trump said on Wednesday, and will “probably hit them hard again tonight.” 
Hours later, the U.S. military announced that it had begun “conducting additional strikes against Iran to further degrade their ability to threaten freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.” 
Trump also suggested on Wednesday that the United States could reimpose its naval blockade on Iran; more than 20 U.S. 
Navy warships are on patrol in the Middle East, according to U.S. 
Central Command. 
The U.S. president warned that U.S. troops are “not attacking at the highest level” yet but that he could order them to bomb critical civilian infrastructure, such as bridges, electric plants, and desalination facilities. 
And he threatened to “take over Kharg Island,” a strategically vital island through which roughly 90 percent of Iran’s crude exports flow. 
Tehran confirmed on Wednesday that overnight strikes killed at least eight Iranian service members, marking the first military deaths from U.S. attacks that Iran has reported since the June cease-fire went into effect. 
Iran retaliated by attacking U.S. military sites in Bahrain and Kuwait. 
Bouts of fighting have threatened the cease-fire before. 
Late last month, U.S. forces launched strikes on Iran in retaliation for Iranian attacks on commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, but the two sides managed to pull back from a return to full-scale war. 
This time could be different, though. 
“I’m not sure I want to make a deal with them,” Trump said on Wednesday, referring to the Iranian regime. 
“We can play games, but I’m not sure I want to make a deal,” Trump continued. 
“Let’s just finish the job.” 
Such threats have foreign leaders worried. 
United Nations chief António Guterres called for both countries on Wednesday to immediately de-escalate, arguing that “a return to full-scale hostilities would have catastrophic consequences—for the peoples of the region, for international peace and security, and for the global economy.” 
Oil prices skyrocketed on Wednesday in the wake of resumed hostilities, with Brent crude climbing more than 5 percent to more than $78 per barrel. 
Still, it is unclear to what extent fighting could resume and who will join the conflict. 
“Obviously, Iran is outside NATO territory,” NATO chief Mark Rutte said on Wednesday. 
“That doesn’t mean NATO could never get involved.” 
War Has Become Pointless by Stephen M. 
Walt 
Erdogan Has Laid a Trap in Ankara by Stefan Ihrig 
Israel Belongs in the New Saudi-Iranian Order by Trita Parsi 
What We’re Following 
NATO summit, Day 2. 
Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States will give Ukraine a license to manufacture Patriot air defense systems. 
The approval marks a significant victory for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has repeatedly called for more Patriots to help combat Russian missile and drone attacks. 
“This way, you can’t complain that we’re not giving them enough,” Trump said during a news conference with Zelensky on the sidelines of the NATO summit. 
But having a license does not ensure effective air defense capabilities in the short term. 
Patriots are expensive, complex munitions that will take time to develop before they are ready for use. 
In the interim, Trump has ruled out giving Ukraine more Patriots, citing a global shortage due to the Iran war. 
“We have Patriots, but we don’t have that many,” Trump said on Wednesday. 
“We need them for ourselves too.” 
Outside of the United States, only Germany and Japan hold licenses to domestically produce Patriots. 
Meanwhile, Trump used the NATO summit on Wednesday to revisit demands that the United States should control Greenland. 
The semiautonomous Danish territory is “very important” for the United States, Trump said, adding, “We need it for protection of the world, not just the United States.” 
He has previously argued that U.S. control is vital to countering Russian and Chinese influence; however, in January, he backed off on threats to seize the island after Rutte de-escalated tensions. 
In response to Trump’s latest comments, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said her country is “ready to defend every inch of NATO, including our own territory” in the event of an attack. 
She further called on NATO members to honor their mutual defense commitments, suggesting that member countries could go to war with the United States if Washington were to try to seize the island by force. 
Cutting off trade. 
Trump ordered the United States on Wednesday to immediately halt all trade with NATO ally Spain. 
“We don’t have to trade with them. 
I don’t want to do any more trade with them,” Trump told U.S. 
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in front of reporters on Wednesday. 
“Don’t even talk to them. 
They’re hopeless, bad people.” 
The U.S. president went on to call Spain a “terrible partner” and a “wasted cause,” citing Madrid’s failure to commit to NATO’s minimum defense spending target of 5 percent of GDP by 2035 and its refusal to allow U.S. forces to launch strikes on Iran from Spanish bases. 
His statement came after Rutte tried to soothe Trump’s ire by stressing that Spain “made a huge step last year” when it raised defense spending to 2 percent, though Rutte acknowledged that “there ​are still issues we have to solve.” 
This is the second time that Trump has instructed Bessent to halt all trade with Spain. 
But as his first such command in March did not actually pause trade, experts suspect that this could also end up being an empty threat. 
Sure enough, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez appeared to downplay Trump’s threat on Wednesday, saying that he had a “very cordial” conversation with the U.S. president during the NATO summit. 
New friendships. 
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney became the country’s first leader in 26 years to visit Saudi Arabia when he arrived on Wednesday. 
The historic three-day trip is expected to focus on bolstering foreign investment as Ottawa considers establishing a free trade deal with Riyadh. 
“I want to get the investment agreement done this year,” Canadian International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu told Bloomberg on Wednesday. 
Carney will meet with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to discuss cooperation in defense, critical minerals, energy, artificial intelligence, and agriculture, among other areas. 
Unlike former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, whose repeated criticism of Saudi Arabia’s poor human rights record soured bilateral relations, Carney is hoping to reset diplomatic ties with the Gulf nation. 
Riyadh appears to be open to closer friendship. 
According to Sidhu, Saudi Arabia is “very, very interested” in more collaboration , especially to counter shipping disruptions caused by the Iran war. 
“The supply chains are being choked off, and they’re looking to Canada as a reliable partner,” Sidhu said, noting that the kingdom is particularly interested in Canadian mining. 
Archaeologists have discovered a well-preserved Byzantine-era city in western Egypt’s Dakhla Oasis, the country’s Tourism and Antiquities Ministry announced on Saturday. 
According to archaeological mission chair Mahmoud Massoud, the unearthed area has evidence of bisecting streets, public squares, two watchtowers, and a basilica from the mid-fourth century. 
Hints of domestic life, such as bread ovens and local coins, were also discovered at the dig site. 
The Dakhla Oasis is one of Egypt’s 34 locations on UNESCO’s “tentative list,” making it just steps away from becoming an official World Heritage Site. 
This post is part of FP’s ongoing coverage . 
Read more here . 
Alexandra Sharp is the World Brief writer at Foreign Policy . 
Bluesky: @alexandrassharp.bsky.social X: @AlexandraSSharp 
War Has Become Pointless 
Marco Rubio Burned Down the House to Fix a Sink 
Israel Belongs in the New Saudi-Iranian Order 
The Global Energy Map Is Being Redrawn in Real Time 
What Will Happen to Iran’s Sea Mines? 
NATO’s New Enemy Is the Thermometer 
Russian Soldiers in Ukraine Are True Believers in Kremlin Propaganda 
African Development Bank Brokers Zambia Debt-for-Energy Swap 
Renewed U.S.-Iran Strikes in Hormuz Threaten Energy Market Recovery 
Nigel Farage's Scandals Might Cost Him Power 
Negotiators from the United States, Canada, and five European countries converse after finishing the draft of the North Atlantic Treaty in Washington on March 18, 1949. 
Trans-Atlanticism Isn’t Dead—It’s Being Renegotiated 
Alexandra de Hoop Scheffer 
An illustration of a vintage-style map featuring North America and parts of Europe and Africa. 
Overlaid on the map are 3D red brick walls shaped exactly like the borders of the contiguous United States and Alaska, casting long shadows to the right. 
America, the Once Global Nation 
A painting depicts Roosevelt on horseback, his right hand raising a sword in the air as he leads a cavalry charge of other U.S. soldiers on horseback. 
The horses' eyes are wide and bulging with fear, and there are scattered starbursts around the scene indicating artillery fire. 
How to Spin an Empire 
An illustration showing a pair of hands tightly wringing out an American flag. 
Water droplets shaped like missiles squeeze out of the twisted fabric and fall toward a puddle shaped like the map of Iran on a red background. 
U.S. 
Power Is Wrung Out 
A rocket is seen from a great distance, flying through a deep blue sky during military drills. 
Several parallel plumes of smoke are seen alongside the rocket's path. 
Missile Defense Worked Against Iran. 
It Might Not Work Against China. 
A creative illustration against a pale yellow background showing a garden planter containing a dense green hedge. 
Five human arms emerge from the hedge, with four of the hands holding small flags of China, Russia, the United States, and the European Union, while the fifth hand holds the flag of India. 
Hedging Is the New Normal 
Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he walks off stage at the end of a campaign rally at the Santander Arena on November 04, 2024 in Reading, Pennsylvania. 
The End of America’s Soft Power 
Central Military Commission Vice Chairman Zhang Shengmin raises his right hand in a salute to Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is walking a level lower in a red-carpeted auditorium. 
The Deeper Pattern Behind China’s Military Purges 
An aerial photo shows Doha in the booming petrostate of Qatar. 
For What AI Could Do to Democracies, Look to the Petrostates 
Zelensky and Rutte walk beside one another. 
Rutte is smiling and gesturing in a welcoming manner toward Zelensky. 
Why This Year’s NATO Summit Is Different for Ukraine 
Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States breaks it down in a new interview. 
Billboards with the slogans “Key to Peace,” “Key to Security,” and “Shared Future in Peace”, displayed along the boulevard on the protocol route ahead of the NATO Summit in Ankara, on 26 June. 
Can NATO Pull Off a Dull Summit? 
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, France's President Emmanuel Macron, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at the start of the E-3 meeting during the 62nd Munich Security Conference on February 13, 2026 in Munich, Germany. 
Europe Is Struggling to Lead NATO 
A pharmacy sign displays the temperature of 44 degrees Celsius in Brussels. 
Putin May Escalate, but Ukraine Is Winning 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.3%Alexandra Sharp: 1.4%Foreign Policy: 3.3%Confirmation Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Alexandra Sharp: 2.5%Foreign Policy: 2.5%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 2.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.6%Foreign Policy: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.0%This article: 3.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 1.8%Foreign Policy: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Alexandra Sharp: 6.7%Foreign Policy: 4.9%Framing Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.2%Alexandra Sharp: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.2%This article: 1.2%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect1.2%This article: 5.3%Alexandra Sharp: 1.5%Foreign Policy: 1.8%Optimism Bias5.3%This article: 4.0%Alexandra Sharp: 2.3%Foreign Policy: 2.8%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 10.0%Alexandra Sharp: 8.3%Foreign Policy: 7.9%Negativity Bias10.0%This article: 2.7%Alexandra Sharp: 1.3%Foreign Policy: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 2.8%Alexandra Sharp: 0.6%Foreign Policy: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error2.8%This article: 1.9%Alexandra Sharp: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.9%This article: 0.2%Alexandra Sharp: 0.5%Foreign Policy: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.2%This article: 0.5%Alexandra Sharp: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.5%This article: 2.2%Alexandra Sharp: 1.1%Foreign Policy: 1.6%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Alexandra Sharp: 1.2%Foreign Policy: 1.3%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 1.4%Alexandra Sharp: 0.3%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.4%This article: 0.7%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.7%This article: 2.9%Alexandra Sharp: 1.4%Foreign Policy: 0.9%Ad Hominem2.9%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.3%Alexandra Sharp: 2.5%Foreign Policy: 2.9%Appeal to Authority2.3%This article: 1.6%Alexandra Sharp: 1.1%Foreign Policy: 1.6%False Dilemma1.6%This article: 3.2%Alexandra Sharp: 0.8%Foreign Policy: 1.3%Slippery Slope3.2%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.9%Alexandra Sharp: 1.7%Foreign Policy: 4.8%Hasty Generalization2.9%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.9%Alexandra Sharp: 3.3%Foreign Policy: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion5.9%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.6%Alexandra Sharp: 2.7%Foreign Policy: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.6%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 1.3%Anecdotal1.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.4%Alexandra Sharp: 1.2%Foreign Policy: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.4%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.3%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Middle Ground0.3%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Alexandra Sharp: 1.5%Foreign Policy: 1.7%Unattributed Quote1.8%This article: 2.9%Alexandra Sharp: 1.2%Foreign Policy: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection2.9%This article: 4.5%Alexandra Sharp: 2.9%Foreign Policy: 5.3%Biased Writer Voice4.5%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexandra Sharp: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Alexandra Sharp: 0.7%Foreign Policy: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

2139 words analyzed.

Speakers

14speakers37%attributed speech1,337writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandra Sharp • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 34 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAntónio Guterres • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMark Rutte • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMark Rutte • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageMette Frederiksen • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMette Frederiksen • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageMark Rutte • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coveragePedro Sánchez • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMark Carney • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageManinder Sidhu • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageManinder Sidhu • 23 words • 0.0% coverageManinder Sidhu • 28 words • 0.0% coverageTourism and Antiquities Ministry • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMahmoud Massoud • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageAlexandra Sharp • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAfrican Development Bank • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageZhang Shengmin • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Maninder Sidhu

100%flagged-word coverage
71 attributed words8.9% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Maninder Sidhu: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Maninder Sidhu: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Maninder Sidhu: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.9 ptsWriter: 0.9%Maninder Sidhu: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.