Publication summary
99% 51 analyzed articles/videos 15,424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breaking Points results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 22,058 hits . Analysis detected 247,522 faulty-reasoning hits from 85,959 analyzed words across 51 videos, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 94% (26 of 410 publications). This Breaking Points is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 85,959
Video count: 51
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score51 analyzed articles86K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 22.5% 22.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 22.9% 22.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 16.2% 16.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Publication 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 25.7% 25.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Publication 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 22.0% 22.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 10.1% 10.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 25.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Publication 22.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 22.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 22.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Publication 12.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 7.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 0.4% Special Pleading: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 0.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst