Speaker summary
57% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,379.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trey Yingst results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 254.991 hits . Analysis detected 1,824.535 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,379.667 analyzed words across 16 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,780 of 28,364 speakers). This Trey Yingst is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. Trey Yingst
Speaker details
Total words: 1,379.667
Content count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.1% percentile 4.6% BS Score16 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.3% 18.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst