Speaker summary
⁠69%5 analyzed articles/videos441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tina Kotek results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 670.743 faulty-reasoning hits from 441 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,417 of 28,364 speakers). This Tina Kotek is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Tina Kotek
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
7.8% BS Score5 analyzed videos441 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos