Author summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antonio Sierra results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 378 hits . Analysis detected 3,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,412 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,051 of 6,162 authors). This Antonio Sierra is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Antonio Sierra
Author details
Total words: 5,412
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst