Speaker summary
73% 14 analyzed articles/videos 268.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Federalist results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 56.2% saturation with 365 hits . Analysis detected 2,502.821 faulty-reasoning hits from 268.667 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of 35% (18,686 of 28,364 speakers). This The Federalist is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. The Federalist
Speaker details
Total words: 268.667
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.1% percentile 21.2% BS Score14 analyzed videos268.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 55.5% 55.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 56.2% 56.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 43.3% 43.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 42.4% 42.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 40.2% 40.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 32.9% 32.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 32.4% 32.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 22.1% 22.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 56.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 55.5%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst