Speaker summary
33% 4 analyzed articles/videos 264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stuart Adams results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 44 hits . Analysis detected 326 faulty-reasoning hits from 264 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (24,820 of 26,422 speakers). This Stuart Adams is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Stuart Adams
Speaker details
Total words: 264
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 7.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos264 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 25.8% 25.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 26.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst