KUER0%

Utah postal workers say they trust vote by mail, giving it their stamp of approval 29%

By Sean Higgins0%

5/29/2026, 12:12:42 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 1,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 863 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (14,318 of 20,179 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the article peer group.

Despite the popularity of vote-by-mail in Utah, state lawmakers have attempted to make changes to the system for the last two years. 
President Donald Trump also thinks mail ballots need an overhaul, and issued an executive order in March to limit the practice because of alleged fraud. 
The union representing America’s postal workers is pushing back. 
“People should feel good about participating in the election process and confident in knowing that postal workers, our members, are committed to making sure ballots get to the right place,” said longtime postal worker Russ Franklin, president of Salt Lake City Area Local 6 of the American Postal Workers Union. 
Starting this week, the American Postal Workers Union is running television ads in Utah encouraging people to use vote-by-mail ahead of the state’s June 23 primary. 
The ads will also run in other states where voting by mail is a prevalent option throughout the year in the run-up to the 2026 midterm elections. 
With the ultimate fate of Trump’s executive order in legal limbo, Franklin said he recognizes the “tussles” around mail-in voting, but remained skeptical of the practical implications of some of the order’s provisions, in particular, postal workers verifying names on a federal voter list. 
“The postal workers will do what the law allows us to do, but verifying whether the people are registered voters or not, the Postal Service doesn't even have the ability to do that based on a piece of mail in front of us,” he said. 
Since Utah switched to universal mail ballots in 2018, vote-by-mail has proven incredibly popular. 
Turnout has significantly increased, and a February report from the Sutherland Institute, a conservative think tank, found 80% of Utahns are confident in the state’s system. 
There has been no credible evidence of widespread election fraud in Utah or elsewhere in the U.S. 
Still, lawmakers in Utah’s Republican supermajority have not been shy about making changes in the name of election security. 
Lawmakers passed HB300 in 2025, instituting some big changes. 
Starting in 2029, instead of automatically receiving a ballot in the mail, voters will have to opt in every eight years. 
If they don’t, they will have to vote in person. 
At the same time, voters must also add the last four digits of a valid identification on the ballot along with their signature. 
“There is a large constituency that has been afraid that maybe people that aren't citizens are voting, and we need to just tighten that up,” bill sponsor Rep. 
Jefferson Burton told KUER’s State Street podcast back in March. 
To further quell some of those concerns, on May 27, Lt. 
Gov. 
Diedre Henderson released the final version of an extensive audit into Utah’s voter rolls. 
It found that of over 2 million registered voters in the state, 27 were verifiably noncitizens. 
Her office removed them from the voter rolls. 
The narrative that noncitizens are somehow committing fraud through vote-by-mail doesn’t sit well with Amy Parke, the state postal workers union president. 
She said after years spent working in corporate America, she’s confident that her colleagues in the Postal Service know what they’re doing. 
“This is the first job that I've ever seen such accountability and such loyalty,” she said. 
“We're not a typical business, because we're a service to the American people, and people take that extremely, extremely serious.” 
Her attachment to vote by mail is not just professional, either. 
“I have family that live in the middle of Utah, in Fillmore and Meadow, who are not able to get out easily to the polls because they're far away from the cities, so they use vote by mail regularly,” she said. 
“I also have a disabled mother who lives in Salt Lake City, who actually depends on vote by mail because she is unable to get out and about.” 
That rural dynamic has stayed lawmakers’ hands in making further changes. 
When more were proposed earlier this year, Senate President Stuart Adams said stricter requirements for voting were more feasible in urban areas of the state. 
“It's probably easier than in rural areas,” he said at the time. 
Even with vote-by-mail under the microscope, both Franklin and Parke said they are not worried about any potential consequences of speaking out. 
“Here in Utah, no, we are not concerned about our jobs and doing our jobs, being harassed by anybody who opposes vote-by-mail,” Franklin said. 
“There are some Utahns that think it's rife with fraud, but there is so little evidence of it that we think it's just a talking point.” 
For Parke, she’s “going to do what's right for the American people, for myself, for my family.” 
“For me, it's not political. 
And you know, as those ballots come in, we have no idea who's voting for who or what those ballots say. 
It's not our concern,” she said. 
”We're here to get the mail delivered. 
We're here to provide the service to the American people. 
That's our job, and that's what we're here to do.” 
Primary ballots go out in the mail the first week of June. 
Election day is June 23. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%Sean Higgins: 2.5%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.9%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Sean Higgins: 2.8%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic1.6%This article: 4.8%Sean Higgins: 1.7%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.8%This article: 1.9%Sean Higgins: 0.4%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 2.1%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Sean Higgins: 5.2%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect12.7%This article: 3.6%Sean Higgins: 0.9%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion3.6%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 1.1%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.1%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Sean Higgins: 4.1%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias5.8%This article: 5.1%Sean Higgins: 1.9%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias5.1%This article: 10.1%Sean Higgins: 5.3%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias10.1%This article: 7.1%Sean Higgins: 4.2%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias7.1%This article: 3.7%Sean Higgins: 0.7%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.7%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Sean Higgins: 2.7%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias5.2%This article: 2.2%Sean Higgins: 0.8%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.2%This article: 11.0%Sean Higgins: 2.1%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect11.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 1.2%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Sean Higgins: 0.5%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.5%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 3.0%Sean Higgins: 0.6%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man3.0%This article: 14.1%Sean Higgins: 4.1%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority14.1%This article: 1.2%Sean Higgins: 2.2%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma1.2%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.7%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%Sean Higgins: 4.7%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 1.3%Sean Higgins: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring1.3%This article: 3.1%Sean Higgins: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon3.1%This article: 11.0%Sean Higgins: 5.5%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion11.0%This article: 3.8%Sean Higgins: 0.8%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question3.8%This article: 1.3%Sean Higgins: 2.5%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.3%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.3%Sean Higgins: 0.3%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.3%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.3%Sean Higgins: 2.4%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal12.3%This article: 2.3%Sean Higgins: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.3%This article: 8.3%Sean Higgins: 1.8%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.3%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.6%Sean Higgins: 0.9%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.6%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 0.8%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.5%Sean Higgins: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice7.5%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 2.4%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Higgins: 1.3%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Sean Higgins: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.0%This article: 3.0%Sean Higgins: 0.6%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.0%

863 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers66%attributed speech290writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAmerican Postal Workers Union • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRuss Franklin • 50 words • 100.0% coverageAmerican Postal Workers Union • 26 words • 100.0% coverageAmerican Postal Workers Union • 27 words • 0.0% coverageRuss Franklin • 44 words • 0.0% coverageRuss Franklin • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJefferson Burton • 28 words • 0.0% coverageKUER’s State Street podcast • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDiedre Henderson • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDiedre Henderson • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 41 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageStuart Adams • 25 words • 0.0% coverageStuart Adams • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRuss Franklin • 24 words • 0.0% coverageRuss Franklin • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 5 words • 100.0% coverageAmy Parke • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAmy Parke • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Stuart Adams

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words6.5% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Politically Right Leaning -9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Stuart Adams: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Stuart Adams: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.