Topic summary
23% 15 analyzed articles/videos 3,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voting results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 3,127 hits . Analysis detected 21,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,062 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (14,115 of 15,142 topics). This Voting is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Voting
Topic details
Total words: 31,062
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score15 analyzed articles31.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst