Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lt Governors Office results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 553 hits . Analysis detected 4,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,672 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (31,821 of 34,511 keywords). This Lt Governors Office is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Lt Governors Office
Keyword details
Total words: 8,672
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst