Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Voters results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 2,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (26,057 of 34,426 keywords). This Utah Voters is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Utah Voters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
25%Utah Voters (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,452
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos