Speaker summary
36% 6 analyzed articles/videos 287.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie White results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 88 hits . Analysis detected 489.585 faulty-reasoning hits from 287.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,710 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie White is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Stephanie White
Speaker details
Total words: 287.667
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 7.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos287.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 19.6% 19.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst