Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shelia Stubbs results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,544 of 28,364 speakers). This Shelia Stubbs is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Shelia Stubbs
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
41.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.8%22.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.8%22.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos