Speaker summary
88%3 analyzed articles/videos118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sergey Brin results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 58.667 hits. Analysis detected 481 faulty-reasoning hits from 118 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (18,603 of 28,364 speakers). This Sergey Brin is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Sergey Brin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 118
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
21.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos118 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 49.7%49.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 66.1%66.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 66.1%, sitewide 26.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 49.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate