Meet the billionaires behind $336M ‘explosion’ of money in California politics, per new report 65%

By Brandon Pho43%

7/17/2026, 8:51:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 601 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.1% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,574 of 21,182 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the article peer group.

Fifteen billionaires have put a total of $336 million into California and national politics so far this year, a new report released this week shows. 
More than half of them are from the San Francisco Bay Area, where organizers on Thursday rallied at the home of the second-biggest individual political spender on state elections, Ripple co-founder and angel investor Chris Larsen, to announce the report's findings. 
The analysis was published by California Common Good, which advocates for the full funding of education and other social safety net services. 
It found that Larsen personally gave roughly $28 million to various state and local races this year, boosting candidates like East Bay state senate candidate Scott Sakakihara, a former Palantir employee, through his Grow California PAC. 
He also tried to defeat local measures such as San Francisco’s ”Overpaid CEO” tax, Proposition D, and was joined in that effort by venture capitalist Michael Moritz and a host of firms that would have been on the hook for the tax. 
Ripple, Larsen’s cryptocurrency company, spent $56 million across state and federal elections, including roughly $5 million to Golden State Promise, a statewide PAC opposing the California billionaire tax proposal  which nevertheless made it on the November ballot  and $49 million to federal PACs advancing a crypto-friendly agenda. 
Combined with Ripple’s corporate giving, Larsen’s spending footprint across local, state and federal elections reached $93 million, according to the report. 
Larsen’s personal giving at the state level was dwarfed only by Google co-founder Sergey Brin, who individually spent $86 million on a host of moderate, pro-business political action committees across California, largely in reaction to the proposed billionaire tax. 
He also spent $500,000 to oppose the San Francisco CEO tax. 
The report identifies Larsen, Brin, and venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as the top four political spenders on state and federal elections this year  and the lion's share of all 15 billionaires' combined spending. 
Collectively, the four men were behind $209 million in personal spending this cycle, a 147 percent increase over their spending in the entire 2023-24 election cycle. 
Money spent doesn’t necessarily translate into political influence. 
In 2024, Moritz spent millions in the San Francisco election, with little effect. 
This year, Steyer didn’t make it past the primary in the governor’s race, and neither did centimillionaire Saikat Chakrabarti in his run to replace Nancy Pelosi. 
Silicon Valley’s favored gubernatorial candidate Matt Mahan  who raised more than $15 million from C-suites including Brin  flopped in the June primary at sixth place. 
As did their favored challenger to South Bay Congressman Ro Khanna, Ethan Agarwal. 
San Francisco is no stranger to concentrated wealth shaping City Hall, and big-money spenders did well here during the last primary. 
Big business interests of the past include real estate developer Walter Shorenstein, who for decades spent hundreds of millions to buy and build tall buildings, stop the San Francisco Giants from moving to Florida, and cement his reputation as a Democratic kingmaker in local and national politics. 
A source close to Larsen said he and his wife, Lyna Lam, were not home at the time of the demonstration. 
A spokesperson for Larsen declined to comment on the rally or the report. 
The report also said a web of political action committees received millions from California billionaires and big corporations  and found that 20 had already raised a combined $289 million this year. 
That amount towers over the total spending from PACs in the 2024 primary elections, the report said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Brandon Pho: 4.2%Mission Local: 2.7%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 14.8%Brandon Pho: 2.8%Mission Local: 0.9%Anchoring Bias14.8%This article: 13.0%Brandon Pho: 3.0%Mission Local: 2.8%Availability Heuristic13.0%This article: 16.5%Brandon Pho: 1.6%Mission Local: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic16.5%This article: 6.5%Brandon Pho: 0.8%Mission Local: 0.4%Hindsight Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 1.3%Mission Local: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Brandon Pho: 8.1%Mission Local: 4.8%Framing Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.3%Mission Local: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.5%Brandon Pho: 0.8%Mission Local: 0.7%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.8%Mission Local: 1.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Brandon Pho: 2.2%Mission Local: 1.3%Pessimism Bias4.3%This article: 34.9%Brandon Pho: 7.3%Mission Local: 6.1%Negativity Bias34.9%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 1.8%Mission Local: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Brandon Pho: 2.8%Mission Local: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error12.5%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Brandon Pho: 1.5%Mission Local: 1.2%In-Group Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.5%Mission Local: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 2.8%Mission Local: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.5%Mission Local: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Brandon Pho: 1.8%Mission Local: 1.0%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 1.1%Mission Local: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Brandon Pho: 2.2%Mission Local: 3.1%Ad Hominem8.8%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.1%Mission Local: 0.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%Brandon Pho: 4.1%Mission Local: 2.8%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 1.5%Mission Local: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 1.9%Mission Local: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.0%Brandon Pho: 6.4%Mission Local: 4.8%Hasty Generalization11.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.8%Mission Local: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.3%Brandon Pho: 3.1%Mission Local: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion2.3%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 1.6%Mission Local: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 27.1%Brandon Pho: 3.9%Mission Local: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)27.1%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.4%Mission Local: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.5%Mission Local: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 7.8%Brandon Pho: 0.9%Mission Local: 0.5%Composition/Division7.8%This article: 12.3%Brandon Pho: 2.5%Mission Local: 2.8%Anecdotal12.3%This article: 8.2%Brandon Pho: 0.5%Mission Local: 0.2%No True Scotsman8.2%This article: 8.2%Brandon Pho: 2.7%Mission Local: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.2%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.1%Mission Local: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.0%Mission Local: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 1.0%Mission Local: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.5%Brandon Pho: 1.6%Mission Local: 1.0%Unattributed Quote3.5%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 1.5%Mission Local: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 26.0%Brandon Pho: 6.3%Mission Local: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice26.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.1%Mission Local: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 7.2%Brandon Pho: 0.5%Mission Local: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias7.2%This article: 14.6%Brandon Pho: 0.7%Mission Local: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias14.6%This article: 0.0%Brandon Pho: 0.4%Mission Local: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

601 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.8%attributed speech590writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageSergey Brin • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sergey Brin

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words100% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-26.4 ptsWriter: 26.4%Sergey Brin: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -14.9 ptsWriter: 14.9%Sergey Brin: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Sergey Brin: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Sergey Brin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.