Keyword summary
47% 3 analyzed articles/videos 601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Andreessen results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 333 hits . Analysis detected 3,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,869 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,466 of 36,204 keywords). This Marc Andreessen is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Marc Andreessen
Keyword details
Total words: 3,869
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst