Keyword summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Larsen results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,602 hits . Analysis detected 10,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,575 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,317 of 35,646 keywords). This Chris Larsen is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Chris Larsen
Keyword details
Total words: 9,575
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst