Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billionaire Spending results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 2,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,803 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,436 of 16,562 topics). This Billionaire Spending is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Billionaire Spending
Topic details
Total words: 1,803
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos