Speaker summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Corporation results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 300 faulty-reasoning hits from 122 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (13,529 of 25,928 speakers). This Science Corporation is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Science Corporation

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos122 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.0%32.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos