Speaker summary
⁠75%3 analyzed articles/videos57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Page results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 46.875 hits. Analysis detected 165.938 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,489 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Page is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Sam Page
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
31.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 62.5%62.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 62.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.3%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos