Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abby Llorico results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 4,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,996 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,325 of 6,171 authors). This Abby Llorico is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Abby Llorico
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
30%Abby Llorico (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,996
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510029.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos