Author summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos1,763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Thiele results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 982 hits. Analysis detected 8,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,264 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,588 of 6,348 authors). This Rebecca Thiele is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Rebecca Thiele
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Rebecca Thiele (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,264
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.2%7.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate