STLPR0%

Solar farm could turn polluted land to boon for East St. Louis residents’ electric bills 52%

By Rebecca Thiele0%

6/8/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 1,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 547 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of 52% (10,518 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the article peer group.

East St. 
Louis wants to turn a polluted property once owned by the aluminum company Alcoa into a community solar project that could save residents money on their electric bills. 
Under this model, residents would pay a $50 yearly subscription fee to receive credits on their electric bills, said City Manager Robert Betts. 
Betts said the 15-megawatt solar farm will supply free energy to about 2,000 low-income residents who pay a $50 yearly subscription fee. 
Another 1,000 higher-income residents can expect to save up to half off their bills. 
Any leftover energy would go to power city buildings and possibly new businesses. 
Construction is expected to start this month and be completed next year. 
Betts said the city is still waiting for Ameren Illinois to approve the interconnection agreement. 
East St. 
Louis proposed the project about 20 years ago when he first became city manager. 
“We tried it way back then, thinking that the process for the cleanup would only take a few years, no more than five, but it's taken 20-some years to get this done,” he said. 
Now Betts is again city manager and picking up where he left off. 
“What can we do to pass some savings on to the citizens, which are low income and struggling to make these monthly utility payments?” 
he said. 
“So that's what really drove me to make sure that we start this project back up.” 
Many people in East St. 
Louis live on fixed incomes, Betts said. 
According to the U.S. census, 32% of residents are in poverty  three times the national average. 
Twenty-three percent are seniors. 
The city worked with Renewable Energy Evolution to develop the project through the Biden administration’s Solar for All program. 
President Donald Trump’s administration clawed back some of that money, but company founder and CEO Brian Maillet said Illinois was able to get that funding into state accounts quickly. 
“Illinois got a lion's share of that money from the federal government because they already had this program in place, so you know the state of Illinois is the place to be right now for solar,” he said. 
Maillet said his company will pay the city upfront to lease the land for the project  which should result in more than a million dollars in revenue to East St. 
Louis. 
The city would take ownership of the solar farm within seven years. 
East St. 
Louis residents will also have to make up 30% of the workforce under the company’s contract. 
“We're going to be training folks, reeducating them and getting them ready for the green energy economy that's happening right now,” Maillet said. 
Because toxic heavy metals and radioactive material are buried just a few feet underground at the former Alcoa site, a solar farm is one of the only safe uses of the land. 
Betts said the solar farm is one of many projects the city is taking on to revitalize East St. 
Louis  including expanding Gateway Arch National Park to the other side of the river. 
"We're building housing developments throughout the city. 
We're improving our infrastructure, so this is a good time to be a city manager in East St. 
Louis," Betts said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.0%Rebecca Thiele: 3.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias19.0%This article: 2.2%Rebecca Thiele: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias2.2%This article: 3.8%Rebecca Thiele: 2.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 4.8%Rebecca Thiele: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Rebecca Thiele: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias2.2%This article: 17.0%Rebecca Thiele: 8.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect17.0%This article: 8.4%Rebecca Thiele: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion8.4%This article: 2.4%Rebecca Thiele: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 8.8%Rebecca Thiele: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect8.8%This article: 21.9%Rebecca Thiele: 5.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias21.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Rebecca Thiele: 3.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias7.5%This article: 9.9%Rebecca Thiele: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Rebecca Thiele: 4.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Rebecca Thiele: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.1%Rebecca Thiele: 7.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority10.1%This article: 5.9%Rebecca Thiele: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma5.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.4%Rebecca Thiele: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization10.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.8%Rebecca Thiele: 4.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion16.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%Rebecca Thiele: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.7%Rebecca Thiele: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.7%This article: 9.5%Rebecca Thiele: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination9.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Rebecca Thiele: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.3%This article: 6.9%Rebecca Thiele: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.9%

547 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers50%attributed speech272writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 23 words • 100.0% coverageRobert Betts • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Maillet • 29 words • 100.0% coverageBrian Maillet • 38 words • 100.0% coverageBrian Maillet • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Maillet • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Betts • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brian Maillet

100%flagged-word coverage
121 attributed words44% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Indoctrination+43.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Brian Maillet: 43.0%43.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +31.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Brian Maillet: 31.4%31.4%Politically Right Leaning +24.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Brian Maillet: 24.0%24.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Brian Maillet: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.