STLPR0%

Police shoot and kill man they say charged at officers with knife, metal pipe in downtown St. Louis 23%

By Rebecca Thiele0%

5/19/2026, 1:24:14 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 495 faulty-reasoning hits from 245 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of 23% (16,964 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the article peer group.

Police shot and killed a man in downtown St. 
Louis on Tuesday morning after, investigators said, he threatened officers with a pipe and a chef's knife. 
Police responded to calls just before 11 a.m. to reports of a man swinging a metal pipe near Locust Street and Broadway, near the Federal Reserve Bank of St. 
Louis. 
Police said the pipe looked like something that might belong to a pop-up tent frame. 
The man also had some kind of stun gun, police said. 
When an officer on a bicycle arrived, the man threw a cup of coffee at the officer and ran north, refusing to put down the pipe, police said. 
Multiple officers responded to the officer’s call for assistance. 
They caught up with the man near the Missouri Athletic Club and tried to use a Taser but said it had no effect on him. 
According to police, the man then charged at officers with the pipe and an officer fired shots. 
They say the man dodged the gunshots, then pulled out a chef's knife and charged at officers again. 
An officer then fired, striking him. 
The man was taken to a hospital, where he later died. 
No officers were injured. 
The St. 
Louis Metropolitan Police Department is investigating the shooting. 
Officers are trying to identify the man and determine whether he had threatened anyone before police arrived. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.7%Rebecca Thiele: 3.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias25.7%This article: 6.1%Rebecca Thiele: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias6.1%This article: 22.0%Rebecca Thiele: 2.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic22.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.9%Rebecca Thiele: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Rebecca Thiele: 8.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect20.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.6%Rebecca Thiele: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 5.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 38.4%Rebecca Thiele: 3.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias38.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 4.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Rebecca Thiele: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 7.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 4.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.9%Rebecca Thiele: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.9%Rebecca Thiele: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof6.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.6%Rebecca Thiele: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.6%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 45.3%Rebecca Thiele: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote45.3%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.9%Rebecca Thiele: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice6.9%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Thiele: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

245 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.3%attributed speech237writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageLouis Metropolitan Police Department • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
0%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words100% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Unattributed Quote-46.8 ptsWriter: 46.8%Louis Metropolitan Police Department: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%Louis Metropolitan Police Department: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.