Speaker summary
43%4 analyzed articles/videos457.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Schwank results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 699.866 faulty-reasoning hits from 457.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,089 of 28,218 speakers). This Ryan Schwank is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Ryan Schwank
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
8.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos457.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 14.8%14.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate