Speaker summary
79% 6 analyzed articles/videos 218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russell Vought results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55% saturation with 188 hits . Analysis detected 688 faulty-reasoning hits from 218 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (15,526 of 28,364 speakers). This Russell Vought is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Russell Vought
Speaker details
Total words: 218
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.3% percentile 28.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos218 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 55.0% 55.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 35.1% 35.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 36.2% 36.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 36.2% 36.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 34.5% 34.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 25.1% 25.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.0%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 36.2%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 36.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 26.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst