Speaker summary
39% 11 analyzed articles/videos 555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rudi Garcia results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 89.409 hits . Analysis detected 591.314 faulty-reasoning hits from 555 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,654 of 28,364 speakers). This Rudi Garcia is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Rudi Garcia
Speaker details
Total words: 555
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score11 analyzed videos555 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst