Author summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monique Curet results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 278 hits . Analysis detected 2,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,402 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,234 of 6,392 authors). This Monique Curet is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Monique Curet
Author details
Total words: 3,402
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.6% Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst