Speaker summary
⁠58%3 analyzed articles/videos1,057.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberto Serrano results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 2,334.954 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,057.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,458 of 28,364 speakers). This Roberto Serrano is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Roberto Serrano
Speaker details
Total words: 1,057.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
5.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.6%15.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Middle Ground: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos