Speaker summary
57% 5 analyzed articles/videos 787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Pape results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 186.654 hits . Analysis detected 1,267.276 faulty-reasoning hits from 787 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,929 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert Pape is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Robert Pape
Speaker details
Total words: 787
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 6.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos787 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 19.4% 19.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst