Speaker summary
⁠83%4 analyzed articles/videos2,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Religious Liberty Commission results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 3,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,040 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,430 of 28,364 speakers). This Religious Liberty Commission is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group.
Religious Liberty Commission
Speaker details
Total words: 2,040
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.3% percentile
5.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.7%13.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos