Author summary
43% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Paz results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 1,456 hits . Analysis detected 14,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,750 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,499 of 6,359 authors). This Christian Paz is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group. Christian Paz
Author details
Total words: 21,750
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles21.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst