Vox50%
ICE arrested a nun on her way to church. Does MAGA care? 9%
By Christian Paz44%
7/10/2026, 10:00:00 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 3,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,527 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26% and a BS Rank of 9% (19,942 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the article peer group.
ICE arrested a nun on her way to church.
Does MAGA care?
Trump says he’s defending religious liberty.
Not when it comes to immigration.
Jul 10, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC
Members of a spiritual delegation arrive at the Broadview Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) processing center to administer Ash Wednesday sacraments to detainees on February 18, 2026, in Broadview, Illinois.
Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu via Getty Images
Christian Paz is a correspondent at Vox, where he covers national politics and American religion.
He joined Vox in 2022 after reporting on national and international politics for the Atlantic’s politics, global, and ideas teams, including the role of Latino voters in the 2020 election.
On June 28, Sister Leticia “Letty” Ugboaja, a Catholic nun from Nigeria, stepped out of her home to take the short, one-block stroll to her church in McAllen, Texas.
It should have been uneventful: dressed in her white habit and bearing a rosary, Sister Letty was walking to Sunday morning mass at Our Lady of Sorrows.
She didn’t make it — US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents stopped, arrested , and handcuffed the 56-year-old.
They took her to a detention facility an hour away, reportedly confiscated her rosary, and declined to bring her the medication she takes.
She called her diocese for help — and as news spread, both Republican and Democratic members of Congress appealed directly to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin for details.
Hours later, she was released — without explanation.
Plenty of questions surrounding this incident remain.
According to her diocese, Sister Letty had worked as a registered nurse in the area for about a decade and entered the country legally.
But the incident is not a one-off — and instead is representative of a concerning trend in America over the last year.
Though ICE and President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement activities have receded from national headlines, Sister Letty’s detention shows how two forces are clashing in the second Trump term: the drive for hardline immigration enforcement and the constitutional imperative of preserving religious liberty and free exercise in America.
The tightening of federal immigration enforcement around religious spaces and believers
The last year of Trump’s mass deportation program has produced many cases like Sister Letty’s — even if they haven’t made national news.
Federal immigration agents have detained and harassed Catholic, Protestant, and Muslim chaplains and priests, while sparking fear across denominations — particularly as religious leaders and communities organized and led responses to immigration crackdowns across the country.
Both the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Sister Letty’s case, or other religious liberty concerns.
They have also not responded to requests for comment to other local and national outlets in the case of Sister Letty.
In November, the Episcopal bishop of Texas reported that a Kenyan priest working for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice had been detained by ICE while leaving his workplace and transferred to a detention facility.
His diocesan leaders said he was working in the US legally, and had the proper documentation to be in the US.
In July 2025, a Muslim hospital chaplain in Ohio was arrested and detained during an immigration check-in.
An Egyptian immigrant, he was held in detention for weeks before finally being released.
And earlier this year, Catholic Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago reported that priests in his archdiocese have been stopped by federal agents and ordered to prove their citizenship.
That’s all on top of clergy who were shot at with pepper balls or sprayed with tear gas at anti-ICE protests in Illinois and California.
Yet this clash has shown up not just through harassment of clergy and those dedicated to religious life, but also in restrictions on how those in detention receive pastoral care, how those trying to provide that care are allowed to operate, and whether places of worship can be free of a federal presence.
For years , federal immigration enforcement was limited by “sensitive location” rules designed to protect places like hospitals, schools, and churches from unnecessary intimidation.
Those guidelines were first formalized during the Obama administration, kept in place by the first Trump administration, and reaffirmed during the Biden presidency.
Nor were these restrictions entirely new: Some form of protection for houses of worship has existed for more than 30 years , according to the legal organization Democracy Forward.
But DHS rescinded the “sensitive location” rules at the start of the second Trump presidency — to “empower” CBP and ICE to go after “criminals” who “will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest,” according to a DHS statement at the time — triggering legal responses from immigrant rights and religious freedom groups.
“For decades, the federal government recognized a simple truth: targeting people at houses of worship violates religious freedom and harms communities,” Bradley Girard, the senior counsel at Democracy Forward, said earlier this year when announcing friend-of-the-court briefs in federal cases brought by a coalition of Quaker, Sikh, and Baptist groups.
“These briefs make clear that the Trump-Vance administration’s policy is not only unlawful — it is dangerous.
It chills religious exercise and undermines public safety by driving people into the shadows.”
Many of those suits ended up succeeding — at least in getting judges to protect various Baptist, Lutheran, Christian, and Sikh places of worship that could prove they were being affected by immigration raids.
But broader federal protections for places of worship have not yet been formalized.
Instead, churches, religious organizations, and legal aid organizations have waged piecemeal legal fights to secure religious liberty protections, like in Minnesota and Illinois — particularly to exercise pastoral care, like providing counseling, sacraments, and religious rituals.
In Minneapolis, for example, Groundwork Legal, a local nonprofit, public interest law firm, sued ICE over a ban on clergy access to the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building.
“Under federal law — both the Constitution and statute — it’s clear that the government can only limit the ability of somebody to practice their religious faith, including the ability to provide [or receive] pastoral care, in the least restrictive means possible given the circumstances,” Irina Vaynerman, the co-founder and lead attorney of Groundwork Legal, told me.
“And here, a categorical bar from even entering the building, to offering that care to anyone who wants to receive, it was obviously not the least restrictive means.”
Groundwork filed that suit in February on behalf of multi-denominational faith organizations and faith leaders under both the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment’s free exercise protections.
They won a preliminary injunction in March, with a judge ordering the federal government to allow faith leaders to offer pastoral care to those held by ICE at the building.
Catholic clergy and religious leaders launched a similar suit last fall in Illinois after ICE and CBP officials denied clergy access to the Broadview federal center to minister to detained people — including offering Communion to them.
They won a partial victory this year, when a judge ordered federal agents to allow clergy access for Ash Wednesday services — and in May, ICE and religious leaders reached an agreement to allow daily visits once again while litigation plays out.
Vaynerman reiterated to me that the Illinois case is still playing out — these agreements and changes are temporary reprieves, in part because no national protections or guarantees have been formalized beyond piecemeal fights over religious liberty and free exercise in specific cities and around specific federal buildings or places of worship.
“Certainly this is something that we know folks are experiencing across the country…and we know that this is happening all over the country because there is not a standard protocol or policies related to this incredibly important constitutional and statutory right,” she said.
“It is so important that the government recognizes [the importance of pastoral care] and then offers that level of access that is constitutionally required to support people going through one of the darkest times in their lives.”
Trump Administration
The Democrat everyone suddenly wants to believe in
Take a mental break with the newest Vox crossword
The lazy but incredibly effective way to stay in touch with friends
How Trump’s son-in-law sparked a revolt in Albania
Why Putin’s nuclear threats aren’t working anymore
Advertiser Content From
This is the title for the native ad
A new speech shows how Israel lost the Democratic party
America needs a real AI economic plan — before the crisis hits
What could Democrats have done differently about Graham Platner?
Is the US at war with Iran again?
Rahm Emanuel and the death of the pro-Israel Democrat.
Ukraine is striking deep into Russia and pressuring Crimea.
Does Putin have any “red lines” anymore?
Jon Ossoff and the dream of a “unity candidate” in 2028.
Future Perfect Jul 9
AI could create a rare chance to remake the safety net.
Washington can’t waste time.
Amanda Litman recruits progressive candidates for a living.
We asked what went so wrong here.
Why the US and Iran are trading strikes, briefly explained.
Speakers
11speakers36%attributed speech976writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageDepartment of Homeland Security
88 attributed words16% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.