Speaker summary
56%6 analyzed articles/videos446.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rafael Mandelman results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 1,452.504 faulty-reasoning hits from 446.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,720 of 28,364 speakers). This Rafael Mandelman is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos446.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate