Speaker summary
56% 6 analyzed articles/videos 446.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rafael Mandelman results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 350 hits . Analysis detected 1,452.504 faulty-reasoning hits from 446.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,720 of 28,364 speakers). This Rafael Mandelman is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Rafael Mandelman
Speaker details
Total words: 446.667
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 7.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos446.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 38.0% 38.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.3% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst