Speaker summary
51%6 analyzed articles/videos112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Putin results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 232 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 16.2% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,331 of 28,364 speakers). This Putin is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Putin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 112
Content count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
16.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos112 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate