Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ines Burrell results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 628 hits. Analysis detected 5,556 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Ines Burrell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ines Burrell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Ines Burrell (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 6,840
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 9.2%9.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos