Speaker summary
70% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,126.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pramila Jayapal results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 458 hits . Analysis detected 3,098.166 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,126.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,339 of 28,364 speakers). This Pramila Jayapal is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. Pramila Jayapal
Speaker details
Total words: 1,126.333
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.6% percentile 5.8% BS Score8 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 27.4% 27.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst