Speaker summary
⁠49%5 analyzed articles/videos190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pew results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 432 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,799 of 28,364 speakers). This Pew is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Pew
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.7% percentile
17.1% BS Score5 analyzed videos190 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 25.1%25.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos