Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos6,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rashawn Ray results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 2,655 hits. Analysis detected 19,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,587 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,594 of 6,358 authors). This Rashawn Ray is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Rashawn Ray
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
44%Rashawn Ray (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,587
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos