Speaker summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Velasquez results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 62.127 hits. Analysis detected 153.127 faulty-reasoning hits from 284 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (24,460 of 37,380 speakers). This Patrick Velasquez is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Patrick Velasquez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠35%Patrick Velasquez (selected)21%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 284
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.6% percentile
20.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos284 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 26.4%26.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Slippery Slope: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos