Author summary
22% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tfrontado results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,161 hits . Analysis detected 4,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,851 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (6,271 of 6,628 authors). This Tfrontado is better (less manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group. Tfrontado
Author details
Total words: 10,851
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst