Speaker summary
67% 6 analyzed articles/videos 716.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paris Hilton results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 290 hits . Analysis detected 1,733.218 faulty-reasoning hits from 716.333 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,518 of 28,364 speakers). This Paris Hilton is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. Paris Hilton
Speaker details
Total words: 716.333
Content count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.0% percentile 5.3% BS Score6 analyzed videos716.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 22.3% 22.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 30.2% 30.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst