Speaker summary
⁠51%2 analyzed articles/videos71 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oregon Health Authority results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 78.4% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 71 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 52.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,992 of 28,364 speakers). This Oregon Health Authority is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Oregon Health Authority
Speaker details
Total words: 71
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
52.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos71 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 78.4%78.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.2%39.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.2%39.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Indoctrination: Speaker 78.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.2%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.2%, sitewide 19.2%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos