Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos193.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nim Kidd results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Loss Aversion, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 293.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 193.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (21,105 of 26,730 speakers). This Nim Kidd is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.0% percentile
14.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos193.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.1%22.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos